LIU
W-L: (11-16) PR = 96.9683Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 1004 A Boston Univ (18-17, 97.8) 2- 4 1010 A Canisius (17-16, 96.8) 2- 3 1011 A Canisius (17-16, 96.8) 6- 1 1017 A Penn State (22-14, 98.7) 4- 5 1018 A Penn State (22-14, 98.7) 0- 3 1024 A New Hamp (14-22, 96.7) 2- 3 1025 A Merrimack (21-15, 98.0) 5- 2 1107 A Rob Morris (17-20, 96.6) 6- 3 1108 A Rob Morris (17-20, 96.6) 2- 0 1114 A Minnesota (11-24, 97.8) 6- 2 1115 A Minnesota (11-24, 97.8) 3- 6 1121 H Merrimack (21-15, 98.0) 2- 6 1122 A Sacred Heart (23-13, 97.6) 2- 7 1128 A Lindenwood (14-14, 97.0) 2- 5 1129 A Lindenwood (14-14, 97.0) 5- 2 1213 A Merrimack (21-15, 98.0) 2- 4 1228 H Army (12-17, 97.0) 4- 4 1231 A Connecticut (19-11, 98.6) 1- 4 103 H Connecticut (19-11, 98.6) 1- 3 111 A Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 3- 2 127 A Alaska Anch ( 5-23, 95.5) 4- 3 213 H Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 1- 3 214 H Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 5- 3 220 A Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 1- 5 221 A Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 2- 3 305 A Lindenwood (14-14, 97.0) 4- 5 306 H Alaska Anch ( 5-23, 95.5) 4- 3 307 H Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 4- 3
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
1004 A Boston Univ 2- 4 -2 -1 -0.79
1010 A Canisius 2- 3 -1 0 -0.83
1011 A Canisius 6- 1 5 0 ++ 5.17
1017 A Penn State 4- 5 -1 -2 1.11
1018 A Penn State 0- 3 -3 -2 -0.89
1024 A New Hamp 2- 3 -1 0 -0.93
1025 A Merrimack 5- 2 3 -1 ++ 4.41
1107 A Rob Morris 6- 3 3 0 + 3.03
1108 A Rob Morris 2- 0 2 0 + 2.03
1114 A Minnesota 6- 2 4 -1 ++ 5.15
1115 A Minnesota 3- 6 -3 -1 -1.85
1121 H Merrimack 2- 6 -4 -1 - -3.32
1122 A Sacred Heart 2- 7 -5 -1 -- -4.01
1128 A Lindenwood 2- 5 -3 0 - -2.63
1129 A Lindenwood 5- 2 3 0 + 3.37
1213 A Merrimack 2- 4 -2 -1 -0.59
1228 H Army 4- 4 0 0 -0.29
1231 A Connecticut 1- 4 -3 -2 -0.98
103 H Connecticut 1- 3 -2 -1 -0.71
111 A Stonehill 3- 2 1 0 1.07
127 A Alaska Anch 4- 3 1 1 -0.14
213 H Stonehill 1- 3 -2 1 - -2.66
214 H Stonehill 5- 3 2 1 1.34
220 A Stonehill 1- 5 -4 0 - -3.93
221 A Stonehill 2- 3 -1 0 -0.93
305 A Lindenwood 4- 5 -1 0 -0.63
306 H Alaska Anch 4- 3 1 2 -0.87
307 H Stonehill 4- 3 1 1 0.34
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1122 A Sacred Heart 2- 7 -5 -1 -- -4.01 1121 H Merrimack 2- 6 -4 -1 - -3.32 1128 A Lindenwood 2- 5 -3 0 - -2.63 213 H Stonehill 1- 3 -2 1 - -2.66 220 A Stonehill 1- 5 -4 0 - -3.93 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1011 A Canisius 6- 1 5 0 ++ 5.17 1025 A Merrimack 5- 2 3 -1 ++ 4.41 1114 A Minnesota 6- 2 4 -1 ++ 5.15 1107 A Rob Morris 6- 3 3 0 + 3.03 1108 A Rob Morris 2- 0 2 0 + 2.03 1129 A Lindenwood 5- 2 3 0 + 3.37 |
LIU Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Force | Air Force | Air Force 5- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Army | LIU | LIU 3- 2 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Bentley | Bentley | Bentley 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Canisius | LIU | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) | LIU | |
| Holy Cross | Holy Cross | tied - ( 3- 3) ( 3- 2) | Holy Cross | |
| Mercyhurst | LIU | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | LIU | |
| Niagara | LIU | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) | LIU | |
| RIT | LIU | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 1) | LIU | |
| Rob Morris | LIU | LIU | ||
| Sacred Heart | Sacred Heart | Sacred Heart | ||
| Michigan | Michigan | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 0) | Michigan | |
| Michigan St | Michigan St | insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 1) | Michigan St | |
| Minnesota | Minnesota | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Minnesota | |
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 1) | Notre Dame | |
| Ohio State | Ohio State | insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 0- 4) | Ohio State | |
| Penn State | Penn State | Penn State | ||
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 3- 0) | Wisconsin | |
| Augustana | Augustana | Augustana | ||
| Bemidji St | Bemidji St | Bemidji St | ||
| Bowl Green | Bowl Green | Bowl Green | ||
| Ferris St | LIU | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | LIU | |
| L Superor | LIU | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | LIU | |
| Mich Tech | Mich Tech | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Mich Tech | |
| Minn St | Minn St | Minn St | ||
| No Mich | LIU | LIU | ||
| St. Thomas | St. Thomas | St. Thomas | ||
| Alaska | LIU | LIU 2- 1 vs 0- 0 | ||
| Alaska Anch | LIU | LIU | ||
| Lindenwood | Lindenwood | Lindenwood | ||
| Stonehill | LIU | insuffient: ( 2- 5)( 1- 4) | LIU | |
| Brown | LIU | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | LIU | |
| Clarkson | Clarkson | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 1) | Clarkson | |
| Colgate | LIU | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 2) | LIU | |
| Cornell | Cornell | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Cornell | |
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Dartmouth | |
| Harvard | Harvard | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Harvard | |
| Princeton | Princeton | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 2- 0) | Princeton | |
| Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | insuffient: ( 2- 5)( 3- 1) | Quinnipiac | |
| RPI | LIU | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | LIU | |
| St Lawrence | LIU | LIU 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Union | Union | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 0) | Union | |
| Yale | LIU | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 3) | LIU | |
| Boston Col | Boston Col | insuffient: ( 2- 5)( 1- 0) | Boston Col | |
| Boston Univ | Boston Univ | Boston Univ | ||
| Connecticut | Connecticut | Connecticut | ||
| Maine | Maine | tied - ( 2- 5) ( 2- 1) | Maine | |
| UMass | UMass | insuffient: ( 2- 4)( 1- 2) | UMass | |
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| New Hamp | New Hamp | New Hamp | ||
| Northeastern | Northeastern | insuffient: ( 2- 4)( 3- 3) | Northeastern | |
| Providence | Providence | insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 0) | Providence | |
| UMass Lowell | UMass Lowell | insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 1) | UMass Lowell | |
| Vermont | LIU | LIU 2- 4 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Arizona St | Arizona St | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Arizona St | |
| Colorado Col | Colorado Col | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Colorado Col | |
| Denver | LIU | LIU 2- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Miami | Miami | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Miami | |
| Minn Duluth | Minn Duluth | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 0) | Minn Duluth | |
| North Dakota | North Dakota | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | North Dakota | |
| Omaha | Omaha | Omaha | ||
| St Cloud St | St Cloud St | insuffient: ( 0- 0)( 1- 0) | St Cloud St | |
| Western Mich | Western Mich | Western Mich |
PowerWise = 19
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 35.94
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Boston Univ (18-17, 97.8) 2- 4 -2.09 2.36 0.36 1.28 -1.11
0 A Canisius (17-16, 96.8) 2- 3 -3.13 1.32 0.36 1.28 -1.77
0 A Canisius (17-16, 96.8) 6- 1 -3.13 1.32 0.36 1.28 4.33
0 A Penn State (22-14, 98.7) 4- 5 -1.19 3.26 0.36 1.28 -0.53
0 A Penn State (22-14, 98.7) 0- 3 -1.19 3.26 0.36 1.28 -0.53
0 A New Hamp (14-22, 96.7) 2- 3 -3.22 1.23 0.36 1.28 -1.83
0 A Merrimack (21-15, 98.0) 5- 2 -1.89 2.56 0.36 1.28 7.51
0 A Rob Morris (17-20, 96.6) 6- 3 -3.27 1.18 0.36 1.28 3.97
0 A Rob Morris (17-20, 96.6) 2- 0 -3.27 1.18 0.36 1.28 3.97
0 A Minnesota (11-24, 97.8) 6- 2 -2.15 2.30 0.36 1.28 6.84
0 A Minnesota (11-24, 97.8) 3- 6 -2.15 2.30 0.36 1.28 -1.14
0 H Merrimack (21-15, 98.0) 2- 6 -1.89 2.56 -0.36 1.28 -1.45
0 A Sacred Heart (23-13, 97.6) 2- 7 -2.31 2.14 0.36 1.28 -1.25
0 A Lindenwood (14-14, 97.0) 2- 5 -2.93 1.52 0.36 1.28 -1.65
0 A Lindenwood (14-14, 97.0) 5- 2 -2.93 1.52 0.36 1.28 4.84
0 A Merrimack (21-15, 98.0) 2- 4 -1.89 2.56 0.36 1.28 -0.98
0 H Army (12-17, 97.0) 4- 4 -2.86 1.59 -0.36 1.28 ********
0 A Connecticut (19-11, 98.6) 1- 4 -1.28 3.17 0.36 1.28 -0.58
0 H Connecticut (19-11, 98.6) 1- 3 -1.28 3.17 -0.36 1.28 -1.05
0 A Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 3- 2 -3.23 1.22 0.36 1.28 4.07
0 A Alaska Anch ( 5-23, 95.5) 4- 3 -4.44 1.00 0.36 1.28 3.50
0 H Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 1- 3 -3.23 1.22 -0.36 1.28 -2.31
0 H Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 5- 3 -3.23 1.22 -0.36 1.28 2.19
0 A Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 1- 5 -3.23 1.22 0.36 1.28 -1.84
0 A Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 2- 3 -3.23 1.22 0.36 1.28 -1.84
0 A Lindenwood (14-14, 97.0) 4- 5 -2.93 1.52 0.36 1.28 -1.65
0 H Alaska Anch ( 5-23, 95.5) 4- 3 -4.44 1.00 -0.36 1.28 1.63
0 H Stonehill (10-22, 96.7) 4- 3 -3.23 1.22 -0.36 1.28 2.19
------
********
|
winning pts = 45.0534 losing points = -21.4982
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------